This one size fits all mentality will never work. I think it would be more appropriate for AOL to allow it's members to TURN ON or TURN OFF this URL blocking scheme. They have the technology to do it, but why make it system wide?

It should be the USERS choice. Why would I want to let some other person decide what sites I would or would not like to see? If I like vitamins, and they don't, why should they get to have a say so? Ok that is the problem with this approach.

You can read more about this by clicking here: