Spam Filter News
 
  Home arrow Spamblog
 
Add to Favorites
Make Home Page

We have 16 guests online

Main Menu
 Home
 Spamblog
 Spam Articles
 Virus Alerts
 Newsfeeds
 Web Links
 Contact Us
 Recommend Us
 Sitemap
 Login

Opinion Poll
How much spam do you receive every day?
Under 100
101 to 200
210 to 300
Over 300
  

Most Read
Spam Filter Technology
Spam Filter Products
Spam and Crooks
SpamAssassins Apache Speaks Out On Sender ID
Email ID is not new!

Our Newsfeed Link
Get our latest news
direct to your desktop!

Fullposts & Excerpts
0.91 FormatRSS FullPostsRSS ExcerptsRSS 1.0 FeedRSS 2.0 FeedATOM FeedOPML Feedhttp://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http%3A//www.mailboxfilter.org/index2.php%3Foption%3Dcom_rssxt%26type%3DRSS1.0%26no_html%3D1

Blog entries written by Robert
How Do We Know What Spam Is?
(Monday, 13 June 2005) Written by Robert

Before we can know what Spam is, it is important to know what is NOT spam. Spam Control is quickly becoming a requirement in todays world.

See what the new Spam Law - Can-Spam Act says.


Email ID is not new!
(Monday, 13 June 2005) Written by Robert

Email ID should be controlled by the end user! Using Email ID is a great concept. However, the big guns on the net propose that this be a server side only solution. There has still been no incorporation of the end user in all this.

The current proposal to use email ID leaves things wide open for legitimate spam to get right through. Why? Because the user has no say so in the matter.

That is why Mailbox Filter created SMART ID.This allows the user to issue Private Keys to anyone in the authorized list. This Smart ID key combines sender and user information to create a special code. This can only be used by the sender. It is a total lock down on security which has been in place since day one within Mailbox Filter.

I applaud the attempts to make our internet more free from spam. But if companies continue to avoid the more complicated issue of incorporating USERS PROFILES to help identify spam for them, it will only continue to be a problem.

Positive acceptance controlled by the USER is the surest way to ensure we get rid of spam. If spammers send email, but the users only accept the mail they want, then it becomes unprofitable. A much more complicated task to overcome, but way more powerful in the long run. It also guarantees that no good email will get lost.

Time will tell how this shapes up.

Sincerely,

Robert Jensen

Your Spam Control Advisor

Sensorship by AOL is Risky
(Monday, 13 June 2005) Written by Robert
AOL blocking websites promoted by alleged spam, due to complaints of some of it's members is very risky in my opinion. It is this sort of sensorhip that borders on constitutional infringement.

This one size fits all mentality will never work. I think it would be more appropriate for AOL to allow it's members to TURN ON or TURN OFF this URL blocking scheme. They have the technology to do it, but why make it system wide?

It should be the USERS choice. Why would I want to let some other person decide what sites I would or would not like to see? If I like vitamins, and they don't, why should they get to have a say so? Ok that is the problem with this approach.

You can read more about this by clicking here:

Too much big brother watching is not healthy!


More...
Spam Software Is Out of Control
So Now They Decide To Survey?

Show archived blog entries by this user


© 2000-2009 Triumvirate Technologies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Mailbox Filter (Patent Pending), Smart Filter Technology, Smart ID, SmartLock, Smart MailRouter,
SmartScan, SmartView, Smart Look, IntelliSort Technology, Self-Learning Filters, SmartCompose, Smart AutoReply,
Smart Profile, SmartDeliver and Smart Link Wizard are trademarks owned by Triumvirate Technologies, Inc.

Get the Smart Spam Filter - Mailbox Filter
Get the Smart Spam Filter!